Digital Citizenship Survey - Google Survey
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ao3_AbrPEQNedHdPdzkwNHdtc2xUUWpHTFZQalE4RFE&usp=drive_web#gid=0
Digital Citizenship Spreadsheet of repsonses to Google Survey
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ao3_AbrPEQNedHdPdzkwNHdtc2xUUWpHTFZQalE4RFE&usp=drive_web#gid=0
Digital Citizenship Survey Response Summary
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/15NBvqOSUmW1Im1chshqS8DOtTM5GgiehFdOeo4vaK0o/viewanalytics
All six classroom teachers at our small school, and two members of administration participated in the survey. That was 100% of those I asked to complete the survey. Their individual responses have remained anonymous. Speaking to teachers after they took the survey, they had the same initial response to the format of the survey as I did. It was very difficult to rank the categories, as the circumstances of the issue would need to be more clearly explained. For example, one might rank the "going online to buy and sell auction items" issue low because they did not see the risk of that issue arising as high; however, if it did arise, it could quickly rise to a higher importance. Anyone of these issues could become "extremely important" depending on the specifics of the circumstances. "Posting private information" and "using the internet to intimidate" were less ambiguous issues in terms of their clarity of importance. "Using a computer in an awkward position" had the biggest distribution of answers along with "going online to buy and sell auction items".
All six classroom teachers at our small school, and two members of administration participated in the survey. That was 100% of those I asked to complete the survey. Their individual responses have remained anonymous. Speaking to teachers after they took the survey, they had the same initial response to the format of the survey as I did. It was very difficult to rank the categories, as the circumstances of the issue would need to be more clearly explained. For example, one might rank the "going online to buy and sell auction items" issue low because they did not see the risk of that issue arising as high; however, if it did arise, it could quickly rise to a higher importance. Anyone of these issues could become "extremely important" depending on the specifics of the circumstances. "Posting private information" and "using the internet to intimidate" were less ambiguous issues in terms of their clarity of importance. "Using a computer in an awkward position" had the biggest distribution of answers along with "going online to buy and sell auction items".